.




Once Upon A Mighty Force

December 16, 2000


PAGE ONE
TROOPS
Our Shrinking Military
Trail Of Troops
Troops Numbers - Last 40 Years
Change in Troops For Each
Administration

Troops By Branch of Service -
Last 40 Years




PAGE TWO
BASES
Trimming The Fat
Original BRAC Rounds
BRAC = Savings
Brace For More BRAC
BRAC Cost vs. Savings
Military Base Locations
BUCKS
Military Budget Tidbits
Defense vs. Other Spending
US Military Spending vs. World
Soldiers' Pay
PAGE THREE
BUCKS (Cont.)
Loss of Equipment
High Cost of Doing War
Financial Cutbacks
DEPLOYMENTS
You Can Be Too Thin!
Where Are Our Troops Now?





PAGE FOUR
THE FUTURE
Modernization
Lighter - Faster = Better
Now That's A Gun!
Turn Around For The Future
George Bush on Defense
This Coming Year's Defense Budget
Request for Ballistic Missiles
PAGE FIVE
THE FUTURE (Cont.)
Request for Selected Weapons
Replenishing Defense Supplies
Another Wrinkle - Euro-Army
Russia's Red Foot In?
Troops For the Euro-Army


PAGE SIX
A Soldier's Christmas










Dear Family and Friends,

TROOPS

Some months ago, one of our readers commented how severely Clinton had cut our military. We, too, thought he was at the root of the problem, but downsizing actually began with the 1989 Bush administration. Even so, Clinton has whacked and chopped the armed forces like mad machetes through sugar cane. To be fair, some of it has been necessary.

In light of so much information, data, national secrets and technology falling into foreign hands during the Clinton administration, one could be forgiven for questioning national security, possibly President Clinton's motives. This old joke might be clever if there weren't so much truth in it.

    CLINTON'S IDEOLOGY

    1. Downsize military
    2. Over-extend military
    3. Allow nuclear secrets to be given to China
    4. Annoy China


OUR SHRINKING MILITARY

In George H. W. Bush's defense, the Vietnam War was signed off at the Paris Peace accord 16 years before. During those 16 years, the ebb and flow of military personnel fluxed only a small degree just in case the Cold War developed into something nasty - like WWIII. In 1989, when the Cold War ceased, there seemed less reason to keep 2.1 million troops on active duty.

Whether it was an act of good faith on President Bush's part or a perceived lessened threat, or both, former President George Bush gave the order to cut troops by 15%. However, Clinton picked up the ball and stormed like a crazed running back for the end zone, chopping here, cutting there, whacking it another 25%. With our national security flung over his shoulder like a Hail Mary, this strategy must be redrawn before we lose the game.

TRAIL OF TROOPS

Source: Military Personnel Historical Reports


During the past four decades, the number of active US military personnel peaked during the Vietnam War from 1965 - 1972. The count stayed within ~114,000 troops for the next 16 years. We turned the corner when the Cold War came to a close in 1989. Many countries sloughed off the yokes of Communism, the Berlin Wall came down and Germany reunited.


ACTIVE TROOPS IN LAST 40 YEARS
Year
Active Troops
(In 1000s)
Year
Active Troops
(In 1000s)
Year
Active Troops
(In 1000s)
Year
Active Troops
(In 1000s)
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
2483
2806
2699

2686
2654
3092
3375
3546

3458
3065

1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
2713
2322
2252
2162

2128
2082

2075
2062
2027
2051

1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
2083
2109
2123
2138
2151
2169
2174
2138

2130
2044

1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
1986
1807

1705
1610
1518
1472
1439
1407
1386
1360

KennedyJohnsonNixonFordCarterReaganBushClinton

Source: Military Personnel Historical Reports


In the last decade, active troops have been cut by nearly 800,000.

CHANGE IN TROOPS FOR EACH PRESIDENT
Years As
Commander
-In-Chief
President
Troops Ending Previous Admin.
(In 1000s)
Troops Ending
This
Admin.
(In 1000s)
Net Change In Active Troops
(In 1000s)
Net
Change As
Percent
1961-1963

1963-1969

1969-1974

1974-1977

1977-1981

1981-1989

1989-1993

1993-2000
John F. Kennedy

Lyndon Johnson

Richard Nixon

Gerald Ford

Jimmy Carter

Ronald Reagan

George H. Bush

Bill Clinton
2475

2699

3546

2162

2082

2051

2138

1807
2699

3546

2162

2082

2051

2138

1807

1360
+224

+847

-1,384

-80

-31

+87

-331

-447*
+9%

+31%

-39%

-4%

-1.5%

+4%

-15.5%

-25%


In addition to heavy personnel cuts, the military has also suffered decreasing numbers due to the surging economy and higher salaries in the private sector. Veterans are being lured away and recruiting offices are having trouble attracting enlistees. According to the May 17th edition of USA Today, Selective Service registration is down. Every man living in the U.S. is required to register for military service within 30 days of his 18th birthday, but just 83% of those turning 20 this year have complied. That figure is down from 90% just two years ago. Most of the non-compliance is in Southern states among immigrants and high school dropouts.

Low morale has also played a role. Whether it's politically correct or not, the fact remains if given the choice, military personnel would rather not see women and homosexuals among their ranks. Add to that, their current Commander-In-Chief dodged the draft. Clinton joined ROTC and then conveniently went overseas avoiding the war. This does nothing for the morale of those willing to fight and die for our country. As a result of presidential cuts and the above-stated reasons, troops numbers have shrunk. Only the Marines have kept up their numbers during the last decade.


DoD ACTIVE DUTY MILITARY PERSONNEL 1950-19991


Source: DoD, Directorate of Information Operations and Reports


Yet while the number of troops has been cut, our military is deployed more often. The Clinton administration dispatched troops into peacekeeping operations in Bosnia, Haiti and Kosovo and these deployments have stretched the military during a time when it struggles to keep up recruiting and re-enlistment rates.

In order to quit stretching our active troops so thinly, it has been suggested that greater reliance be placed on reserve forces. It has also been suggested that our overseas presence could be cut by 200,000 in Europe, Japan and South Korea. Third, rather than using the military for humanitarian and disaster relief, possibly other organizations could take over these areas. Last, like most big groups (IRS for example) red tape and enormous piles of paperwork strangle expediency. Red tape reduction would represent a significant savings and this money, along with that saved from BRAC (base closures), could be applied in other needed areas.

Continue

© Text and Graphics, 2000 Stan and Holly Deyo, except where otherwise credited